Skip to main content

A stellar explosion may be the brightest supernova seen so far.


The largest supernova has ever been seen, it is so large, that we can guess from the fact that its light was so much that it is equal to all the stars of the Milky Way. The supernova that was seen in 2016, 4.6 billion light years away, wasted about 5 sexdillion (5 followed by 51 zeros) of energy. Researchers believe that this supernova may be the brightest, and the first known example, of a rare type of stellar explosion.

In an April 13 Nature Astronomy report, the researchers said that such an explosive explosion could be a vibrating pair-instability supernova - when an extremely massive supernova collided with a shell of matter, dropped by the star before it exploded is.  There is no single, well-established case of such a supernova, say researchers, Philip Podcidolsky, an astrophysicist at the University of Oxford, that such phenomena can be understood by computers, Simulations can help confirm the nature of the star's demise.

Researchers dubbed the supernova in the SN2016aps, and then identified in observations from the survey by Pan-StarRS, that the supernova has been monitoring fading, illumination for the past two years, by astronomer Matt Nicholl and his colleagues. The amount of stellar debris emanating from the supernova indicates that this star was at least 50 to 100 times larger than the Sun, while the stars behind an ordinary supernova are about 10 solar masses.

New research has shown that there are surprising amounts of hydrogen in the debris, although larger stars usually lose their hydrogen faster than smaller stars. Nicole of the University of Birmingham in England says, for stars in the 100-solar-mass regime, you expect such, that all hydrogen dissipates well before it explodes. But a new discovery suggests that two small stars containing hydrogen have still merged into a supersized star, which has undergone a vibratory pair-instability Cernova.

Nicole says that inside large-scale stars, the temperature in the b core can be so high, that photons, which the stars sustain permanently, protect themselves from collapsing under their own gravity, and the particles  Are converted into pairs, which are pairs of electrons and positrons. The star's photons, or particles of light, disappear, due to which the wire loses some pressure from its core, and because of which it begins to contract, there is a possibility of a thermonuclear runway being formed.

The explosive reaction of the star can release enough energy to blow the outer layers into a heavy shell.  When the star ends, it becomes a supernova, the supernova explosion hits the shell to release a large amount of radiation.  Nicole and his team speculated that the stellar remnant during the supernova could be an intensely magnetic neutron star, called a magnetor (SN: 11/8/17), a  Only one can pump energy into the explosion.


The size of the star undergoing the supernova explosion leads one to think that the supernova observed in 2016 may have forged a black hole instead of forming a magnet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Esa / Nasa Hubble Space Telescope captured the image of cluster 47 Tucanae.

The Nasa/Esa Habble telescope has captured an image of a group of stars, spherical in shape, spanning a large area, this group of stars has billions of stars, these stars have their own color, which is much about them  It says.  In the image we can see, around 35,000 stars are visible near the center of the cluster 47 Tucanae , the stars are tightly packed near the core (top left) of the cluster, and propagate farther away from the core.

In the cluster image of stars, how stars are shown in natural colors, scientists have told about their composition and age through the color of stars, as the star which appears red, the stars end of their life. Is near, bright red signifies giants, while more common yellow stars indicate that these stars are still young, whose age is similar to our sun.

Cluster 47 Tucanae image taken by Hubble's Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2, this image was taken in 1999.

According to Nasa's report the rules protecting other planets from pollution can be very strict

Some scientists believe that the moon will have an interesting mission to seek life, with scientists also considering it as a potentially interesting site to investigate the origin of life on the Moon. But some scientists say that most of the moon is not astrologically interesting. Some places on the moon, Mars and other planets are safe, while some places are unprotected.  Some policies may be too strict to protect the Moon, Mars and other places.

What was the conclusion of NASA's 12-expert panel To review voluntary international guidelines, to keep space missions polluting other worlds with earthly life. These guidelines are recommendations of the international scientific organization COSPAR, which revised policies for spacefaring countries for decades.  Nasa will send a sample-collection mission to Mars next year, the same other space agency also lunar  Interpretation of preparing the trip, as the scientists, there is an urgent need to update safety guidelines of the planets.  A…

How did life begin on Earth? Is it possible by a violent collision on the moon.

The moon, which has many stories to make, did the violent, and cosmic collision during the making of the moon make life possible on earth? This is a big question, but a new study shows that this is true. Science has given many theories about life on earth, but there is always a question in our mind that how life came to be born on earth.Given by science, has many theories, and tries to explain to us how to find elements for life on our planet: such as carbon and nitrogen elements.
Scientists have previously believed that meteorites have brought life-giving elements to Earth, bacteria with meteorites coming from space for example, and the energy of explosions caused by the continuous fall of meteorites from organic matter.Synthesis of. And the isotopic signatures of these elements on Earth coincide with those objects, but what? The ratio of carbon to nitrogen is not very accurate.If we think of transporting the elements that are important for life on Earth due to meteorites, then each p…