Skip to main content

According to Nasa's report the rules protecting other planets from pollution can be very strict

                                               
Some scientists believe that the moon will have an interesting mission to seek life, with scientists also considering it as a potentially interesting site to investigate the origin of life on the Moon. But some scientists say that most of the moon is not astrologically interesting. Some places on the moon, Mars and other planets are safe, while some places are unprotected.  Some policies may be too strict to protect the Moon, Mars and other places.

What was the conclusion of NASA's 12-expert panel To review voluntary international guidelines, to keep space missions polluting other worlds with earthly life. These guidelines are recommendations of the international scientific organization COSPAR, which revised policies for spacefaring countries for decades.  Nasa will send a sample-collection mission to Mars next year, the same other space agency also lunar  Interpretation of preparing the trip, as the scientists, there is an urgent need to update safety guidelines of the planets.  And reviewed by Thomas Zurbuken, Associate Administrator of NASA's Directorate of Scientific Missions, in a teleconferencing on October 18, he said, he believes, 'We want to honor the integrity of the places we go, and our homes.  Let's protect the planet.  A report found that current regulations may make future missions unnecessarily complex or costly.

Astrobiologists have warned against landing on the moon and other planets, that it is against too much loosening of the current guidelines.  Landing of spacecraft in areas considered sterile can still contaminate contaminated areas, which are potentially interesting for astronomy.  John Rommel of the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California, says that the lunar atmosphere is stored in cold traps in the south and north anyway, and because of that the landings will not have to be landing. In its report, the review panel reported its report  I also recommended reassuring contamination risks on Mars, designed to meet rigorous sterilization standards for missions on Mars, and  It is intended to expose the components of the spacecraft to chemicals or harsh radiation, but some experiments have suggested that Earth's germs will struggle to survive spreading to many parts of Mars.

The report of the exploiters states, for some time, specific areas of search for life on Mars have been identified as high priority areas, and the same other areas can be designated as human exploration areas.From where the germs brought by astronauts will not have such problem.  Stern says, some places on Mars have high interest to understand the possibility or evolution of past life, not all places on Mars have this capability.  Cornell University astronomer Alberto Fearn has welcomed the possibility of adding nuances to the "extremely restrictive" security guidelines for Mars. The SETI Institute's rumor takes a more conservative view.  He believes that there are undoubtedly places on Mars, where the Earth's micro-organisms cannot grow, he says, to know that those spots are with full confidence, and to know that the rub is quite a stretch. Is understanding Mars, and he said that we do not know enough about Mars. NASA now reports in updating its own practice standards for planetary security.  Su will consider.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Esa / Nasa Hubble Space Telescope captured the image of cluster 47 Tucanae.

The Nasa/Esa Habble telescope has captured an image of a group of stars, spherical in shape, spanning a large area, this group of stars has billions of stars, these stars have their own color, which is much about them  It says.  In the image we can see, around 35,000 stars are visible near the center of the cluster 47 Tucanae , the stars are tightly packed near the core (top left) of the cluster, and propagate farther away from the core.

In the cluster image of stars, how stars are shown in natural colors, scientists have told about their composition and age through the color of stars, as the star which appears red, the stars end of their life. Is near, bright red signifies giants, while more common yellow stars indicate that these stars are still young, whose age is similar to our sun.

Cluster 47 Tucanae image taken by Hubble's Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2, this image was taken in 1999.

How did life begin on Earth? Is it possible by a violent collision on the moon.

The moon, which has many stories to make, did the violent, and cosmic collision during the making of the moon make life possible on earth? This is a big question, but a new study shows that this is true. Science has given many theories about life on earth, but there is always a question in our mind that how life came to be born on earth.Given by science, has many theories, and tries to explain to us how to find elements for life on our planet: such as carbon and nitrogen elements.
Scientists have previously believed that meteorites have brought life-giving elements to Earth, bacteria with meteorites coming from space for example, and the energy of explosions caused by the continuous fall of meteorites from organic matter.Synthesis of. And the isotopic signatures of these elements on Earth coincide with those objects, but what? The ratio of carbon to nitrogen is not very accurate.If we think of transporting the elements that are important for life on Earth due to meteorites, then each p…