Skip to main content

Astronomers suggest that light is a problem for life on a planet orbiting a black hole.

                                               
What is important for life in any planet, the presence of water in that planet, and that planet being at a distance from its sun.  Can there be life in any one planet, which has no sun, by the way, we know that the sun is the main reason for any planet to have life.  A planet has been seen that is orbiting a black hole with no star around it, but astrophysicist Jeremy Steintman believes that there is a possibility of life in that planet, but how in that planet There can be life, which has no star of its own, Jeremy Steintman is an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Jeremy Steintman has a tongue-in-cheek approach to those issues. Described in the form, he believes that planet can be life, he has written a paper outlining his idear.

Regarding life on a planet orbiting a black hole, space scientists are skeptical about the idea of ​​life on that planet, mostly because of the possibility that to provide light and energy, that  No star around the planet.  Jeremy Steintman started thinking about planets, can there really be life on that planet ?,There cannot be a sun around to provide light and energy for life on a planet near a black hole, Schichtman noted, that such a formidable space may not have enough reason to control life  Is, because black holes usually have accretion disks consisting of hot gas and other substances, and such disks are used for light and energy to survive life.  Could do with a planet. 

Schteinman believes that black holes will transfer high energy to light reaching nearby planets, which can be destructive to life, and such blue shifting transports all lightheats to the planet, and contains harmful UV  Rays are also included. It is still unclear whether any planets can exist near a black hole, and this is unlikely.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

According to Nasa's report the rules protecting other planets from pollution can be very strict

Some scientists believe that the moon will have an interesting mission to seek life, with scientists also considering it as a potentially interesting site to investigate the origin of life on the Moon. But some scientists say that most of the moon is not astrologically interesting. Some places on the moon, Mars and other planets are safe, while some places are unprotected.  Some policies may be too strict to protect the Moon, Mars and other places.

What was the conclusion of NASA's 12-expert panel To review voluntary international guidelines, to keep space missions polluting other worlds with earthly life. These guidelines are recommendations of the international scientific organization COSPAR, which revised policies for spacefaring countries for decades.  Nasa will send a sample-collection mission to Mars next year, the same other space agency also lunar  Interpretation of preparing the trip, as the scientists, there is an urgent need to update safety guidelines of the planets.  A…

How did life begin on Earth? Is it possible by a violent collision on the moon.

The moon, which has many stories to make, did the violent, and cosmic collision during the making of the moon make life possible on earth? This is a big question, but a new study shows that this is true. Science has given many theories about life on earth, but there is always a question in our mind that how life came to be born on earth.Given by science, has many theories, and tries to explain to us how to find elements for life on our planet: such as carbon and nitrogen elements.
Scientists have previously believed that meteorites have brought life-giving elements to Earth, bacteria with meteorites coming from space for example, and the energy of explosions caused by the continuous fall of meteorites from organic matter.Synthesis of. And the isotopic signatures of these elements on Earth coincide with those objects, but what? The ratio of carbon to nitrogen is not very accurate.If we think of transporting the elements that are important for life on Earth due to meteorites, then each p…

Contact with the lander-rover may have been lost, but expectations from the orbiter are still intact.

Signal was stopped from the Vikram lander just 2.1k.g before the landing,and for some time there was silence in the center of ISRO, as the Vikram lander was seen up to 2.1 k,g altitude with normal performance. Subsequently,communication from the Vikram lander to ground stations was lost.The data was analyzed by scientists, but nothing came out, even though contact with the lander-rover has been lost, but expectations from the orbiter are still.
Vikram Lander kept contact with the lander for a distance of 2.1 km from the moon, but after that the contact broke, scientists could not contact the lander again.Siwan of ISRO ceo says that only after studying the data that has been received at the last time of landing, the cause of contact breakdown will be known.On this occasion, Prime Minister Modi, who was present at ISRO's headquarters in Bengaluru, took updates from scientists.When ISRO chief Sivan was giving updates to the PM, then fellow scientists patted him on the consolation.
The flo…